F1000 or Papers3

alenguav

Hello,
I recently discored Manuscripts and I am starting to use it for redacting my thesis
as I don't like much MS Word and liked the fact that Manuscripts' interface is very
similar to Scrivener. However I was wondering why there are references to these 2 reference managers:
http://f1000.com/work/
https://www.readcube.com/papers/mac/

Which one is better to work with Manuscripts?

hubob

Hi alenguav,
Manuscripts is supposed to work with multiple reference managers, so in theory it shouldn't matter much. However, papers is not developed anymore (it was bought by readcube and a combined Readcube/Papers version is supposed to be released sometime soon, so I wouldn't recommend to start using it now). I would also really recommend to read the other threads on this forum to be aware of the potential caveats of using Manuscripts at all at this point. Hope this helps!